The anti Sichuan shaped tray is a structural variant of the Sichuan shaped plastic tray, characterized by the reverse design of the bottom support structure. Compared to the traditional "Chuan" shape with three longitudinal main beams at the bottom of the Chuan shaped pallet, the anti Chuan shaped pallet uses three transverse main beams as the main load-bearing structure. This design creates a 90 degree difference in forklift operation direction compared to traditional pallets, making it suitable for the operational needs of specific logistics scenarios.
Key feature analysis:
Structural Design
Bottom layout: The horizontal three bar structure forms an inverted "chuan" shape, with more evenly distributed support points.
Forklift adaptability: Forklift gear inserts need to enter from the short side of the pallet, complementing the long side entrance of traditional Sichuan style pallets.
Enhanced configuration: Can embed 8 steel pipes for reinforcement, with a static load capacity of 4 tons and a dynamic load capacity of over 1.8 tons.
The structural design differences between Sichuan style pallets and anti Sichuan style pallets
Bottom support layout
Chuan shaped tray: The bottom consists of three longitudinal main beams, presenting a regular "Chuan" shaped structure, with support points concentrated on the longitudinal axis.
Inverted "Chuan" shaped tray: using three horizontal main beams or honeycomb grid structure to form an inverted "Chuan" shape, with more even distribution of support force.
Forklift operation direction
Chuanzi pallet: Forklift gear inserts need to enter from the long side of the pallet (i.e. 1200mm direction).
Anti Sichuan style pallet: Forklifts need to enter from the short side (1000mm direction), forming a 90 degree operational difference from traditional pallets.
The anti Chuanzi tray solves the limitations of Chuanzi tray in heavy-duty, automated warehousing and other scenarios through horizontal mechanical distribution and intelligent module integration. However, Sichuan style pallets remain the mainstream choice for lightweight logistics due to their low cost and versatility. The essence of the difference between the two is the evolution of logistics tools from "universal" to "scenario customization".
2025-04-09
